Read more opportunities. Give the right ones more attention.

I built a job-search product that discovers roles, explains mutual fit and prepares a coordinated application package.

Open Offero

A closer look at the workSee the product

OfferoSystem overview

Discover roles

Collect full descriptions from relevant vacancy sources.

Assess mutual fit

Compare the work and requirements with experience, interests, and constraints.

Prepare the application

Build coordinated documents using relevant, grounded evidence.

Review and learn

Check the package, submit personally, and use outcomes to improve the rules.

Process illustration · Read the build decisions below

The working product

Inside Offero

Screens from the working product, translated into English. Sensitive information blurred.

Offero pipeline with opportunity assessments and next actions; company and role details blurred. — Compare opportunities, review their assessments and see the next action in one workspace.

01 / The problem

Good opportunities deserve more attention

A title is a poor shortcut for the actual work in a vacancy. Careful selection requires reading the responsibilities, understanding the employer and comparing the requirements with real experience. Doing that across a large pool of roles left little attention for the opportunities I wanted to pursue.

02 / The build

How I built it

Offero collects full role descriptions and assesses the work against my experience, interests and constraints. It explains the relevant strengths and gaps, so I can inspect the reasoning behind a recommendation. I calibrated that assessment through close review and an audit of application outcomes.

For a selected role, the workflow prepares a CV, cover letter, outreach draft and interview notes from a shared account of the application. Factual review keeps claims connected to the underlying career evidence. I make the final decision and inspect and submit the materials myself.

My role

I defined the product around my own search, built the workflow and dashboard, and refined the rules while using it. The first prototype took a day; I brought it to a working state over the following week and continued improving it through real applications.

03 / In practice

A fit decision before a polished CV

What is the actual work?

Decision evidence

Responsibilities determine the role category

Where is the match?

Decision evidence

Specific projects support the relevant requirements

What is missing?

Decision evidence

Essential gaps stay visible and can cap the score

What happens next?

Decision evidence

Review the fit, then prepare the application package

Illustrative decision record. This does not show a real candidate or employer.

04 / The result

1,000+roles assessed weekly

10–15 mintypical remaining work per selected application

Offero assesses more than 1,000 roles weekly in my own search. Once a role is selected and the materials are prepared, my review, company research and submission typically take 10–15 minutes, or up to 30 minutes for an important application. Comparable custom preparation previously took me two to three hours; those estimates exclude finding and selecting the vacancy.

Its broader value is the depth of coverage: I can examine more opportunities carefully and reserve my attention for the ones that fit. These are results from my own use, with final judgment and submissions remaining mine.

Keep exploring

AI Working Memory

I built a source-grounded working memory for projects, decisions, agreements and the questions still worth answering.

Next case